The Frost v. Lion Brand Yarn Co. ruling highlights a new reality: Businesses are expected, both from a legal and ethical ...

A recent Supreme Court case marks the end of America’s three-decade experiment with extreme leniency.

The court’s rules require many litigants to submit 40 copies of their briefs, resulting in millions of pages printed each term. Critics call the process outdated and wasteful.

The conservative-dominated Supreme Court’s decision to hear the cases comes two weeks after it upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical treatment for transgender minors.

Share on Twitter Share by Email Share Back to top Digital health companies increasingly rely on AI-powered messaging platforms, chatbots, and virtual ...

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take up transgender sports laws from Idaho and West Virginia, among the 27 states that have such laws.

Unfortunately for TikTok, the Supreme Court didn't take the bait ... Joel Thayer is president of the Digital Progress Institute and an attorney based in Washington, D.C. Zephyr Teachout is a Law ...

The Supreme Court on Monday morning added seven new cases, covering issues ranging from campaign-finance regulations to the flexibility of the deadline to move a case from state to federal […] ...

The U.S. Supreme Court concluded a consequential week by issuing several significant rulings that touched upon religious freedom in public education, the scope of nationwide injunctions, and the ...

Pornhub was among the plaintiffs challenging a Texas law that requires users of adult sites to submit personal information ...

The Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law aimed at blocking children under 18 from seeing online pornography by requiring websites to verify the ages of all visitors. Many states have passed similar ...

The Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law aimed at blocking children under 18 from seeing online pornography by verifying people’s ages online ...