When the justices rule without offering a rationale, we can't know if they are following the law or just exercising power.

The Supreme Court has long been criticized for its unwillingness to televise, or even record, its proceedings. But debate about transparency at the nation’s highest court should extend far ...

Democrats and Republicans on a House panel agreed Thursday that the Supreme Court should be more transparent when it issues significant rulings on its so-called shadow docket, and some lawmakers ...

A Detroit woman can proceed with a lawsuit against an online gambling giant in Michigan, after the state Supreme Court ruled ...

Transparency between the American people and the U.S. Supreme Court has been a contested issue for years. The SCOTUS debates topics like gun control and abortion rights, but you cannot listen to ...

With the Supreme Court’s reputation taking a beating lately, you’d think the justices might want an easy win for transparency by livestreaming their opinions. You’d be wrong.

The Supreme Court refuses to livestream all of its proceedings, ... I noted the transparency issue last June in connection with Sotomayor and Justice Clarence Thomas speaking about affirmative action.

The Supreme Court’s Ethics Issues Are Not All Created Equal ... Transparency and disclosure rules don’t just exist to alleviate public concern about judicial behavior.

The Supreme Court has never allowed its oral arguments to be filmed. Photography is also forbidden. Except for the work of sketch artists like Art Lien , there is no authorized visual record of ...

Such lack of transparency is only part of the context behind the Supreme Court’s silence in the closely watched Texas case. The emboldened conservative majority already is poised to reverse or ...