The administration’s approach, led by White House and Justice Department officials, would focus on a legal rather than a scientific rationale for repealing the so-called endangerment finding.

Experts have warned that if the EPA were to bring back dicamba, the results would be devastating—as they have been in the past when the chemical was used.

EPA plans to reverse endangerment finding, a foundation of the federal government's ability to address climate change.

EPA poised to ignore landmark finding that will limit its battle against climate change - A 2009 scientific finding established that greenhouse gas emissions pose a danger to human health

The resulting conflict is playing out in courtrooms, statehouses and regulatory agencies across the country. It’s grounded in constitutional questions of federal preemption, the commerce clause and Tenth Amendment state sovereignty.

EPA to Reconsider Asbestos Part 1 Risk Management Rule Following Legal Challenge by: Kathryn A. Bursick , L. Claire Hansen of Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. - Toxic Substances Control Act Blog Saturday ...

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin claims to prioritize combatting long-lasting chemicals called PFAS. Despite this, the agency has delayed enforcement of standards and terminated over $15 million in funding for “forever chemicals” research.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2025 term delivered two decisions reshaping environmental and administrative law. In City and County of San Francisco v. EPA, the court invalidated so-called "end-result" provisions in Clean Water Act (CWA) permits.